Claiming Victory at What Price?

Author: on 01/23/2015

shutterstock_193122386Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is claiming victory in the transition of its family detention center model from Artesia, New Mexico to Dilley, Texas. On a working group tour of the Dilley detention center on January 13, 2015, ICE sang its own praises about all of the changes they had implemented after the shutdown of the Artesia facility and how great the permanent facility in Dilley will be once completed.

The detention facility they are lauding is expected to be the largest in United States history, reaching a capacity of 2,400 and a reported cost of nearly $300 per detainee per day.

Many of the most vulnerable who seek protection in the United States will end up imprisoned there for indefinite amounts of time. It is shameful that children as young as 18 months are being held there right now. It is wrenching that women who are victims of severe trauma and abuse are imprisoned there. But in many ways, the most tragic are the indigenous women from all over Guatemala who are likewise jailed without a clear indication of why they are there or what the process is for fighting their removal.

Fleeing for safety, they end up in a world of confusion and isolation. They arrive to the Dilley detention facility not yet understanding what has happened to them since they attempted to cross the border, and then remain detained for months in almost complete isolation.

They are isolated because when they arrive at Dilley, nearly all of them are oriented in Spanish instead of in their native language. That’s how detention begins for them. Despite the fact that most of them speak little to no Spanish or English, Spanish and English are all they hear. They are used to being marginalized and ignored and persecuted but you would think that in the United States we could do better.

They cannot communicate concerns or needs to facility employees, deportation officers, or others at the detention center. They cannot communicate with other women and children at the facility. They cannot communicate with immigration judges or asylum officers, and many are pushed through the process with no opportunity to tell their story, as indigenous language interpreters are few and far between.

Two weeks ago, I sat in on a pro se hearing, where an asylum seeker represents herself, at Dilley. A woman who speaks Quiche sat at the counsel table with only her daughter by her side, facing an immigration judge on the video screen. The daughter looked to be about 10 years old. They listened intently as the judge spoke to them, in Spanish. The daughter leaned in, trying desperately to understand what the judge was asking, while her mother sat uncomprehending, staring at the video screen. The immigration judge would ask questions and the little girl would tell her mother what to say in response. The immigration judge caught on to this issue after a few questions, and asked the mother what her preferred language is. She responded that she speaks Quiche, not Spanish. The immigration judge asked her if she understood what had happened so far. The mother repeated that she does not speak Spanish. The immigration judge explained that she would find a Quiche interpreter and would have another hearing. Neither mother nor daughter understood what the judge had said. After a few more attempts to explain what had happened, the immigration judge gave up. The mother and daughter stopped me as they left, seeking information. I attempted to explain to them what I had understood but they hadn’t, using one word at a time and miming with numbers and my hands, what the immigration judge had said. Two. Days. Quiche. Back here. I hope they understood, but how could I ever know?

This woman and her daughter are in removal proceedings. The U.S. government is trying to deport them. And they have no idea what is happening. When I tried to ask if the woman had spoken to a lawyer, she could not understand my question. It was the most heartbreaking thing I had ever witnessed, even after being in Artesia for more than five months.

ICE insists on detaining these women and children. Most are victims of severe violence in their home countries. They are completely isolated and cannot understand what is happening in their immigration cases. At the time we toured Dilley, with only 10% of its total expected capacity filled, there were eight indigenous language speakers and their children detained there, unable to understand what they need to do to be reunited with family members here in the United States.

The government contends that these women and children constitute a “national security threat” and must be detained. Surely this “national security threat” is not so great, when the women and children involved cannot even communicate with those around them. When they cannot even understand how to find an attorney, let alone work with one on their claims for protection. When they have absolutely no chance at getting due process when the decisions being made could mean life or death, asylum or removal.

ICE can brag about the virtues of Dilley as much as they want, but this facility is what it has always been: a gross political abuse designed to detain the most vulnerable of those seeking protection in the United States, with no regard for due process or human decency.

Written by Christina Brown, AILA Member and Lead Attorney for the AILA – Immigration Council Artesia Pro Bono Project


If you are an AILA member who wants to volunteer at a family detention center, please go to or feel free to contact Maheen Taqui at–we are looking for more as the work continues and we could really use your help.

If you aren’t able to come help in person, consider donating at And thank you!

To watch videos of the volunteers at Artesia and elsewhere sharing their experiences, go to this playlist on AILA National’s YouTube page. To see all the blog posts about this issue select Family Detention as the category on the right side of this page.

Mexican Consulates Will Issue Birth Certificates…Starting Today!

Author: on 01/15/2015

shutterstock_160340369A longtime struggle for many Mexican citizens living in the United States is the inability to access their birth records.  Some may have been born in a state where they no longer have contacts and they struggle to acquire their birth certificate.  In practice, this can definitely be a significant hurdle that our clientele faces.  As of today, the Mexican government plans to make the process of acquiring a birth certificate much easier.  All 50 consulates of Mexico in the United States will begin issuing certified copies of those essential documents.

This announcement and change in policy comes at a critical juncture for millions of Mexican citizens living in the United States that may be eligible for Deferred Action for Parents or Childhood Arrivals (DAPA/DACA).  As part of the process in applying for the DAPA/DACA benefit, applicants will need to provide evidence of who they are.  Having a birth certificate, passport or some form of government issued identification will be essential in getting an approval from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

By providing birth certificates at the consulate, the Mexican government will hopefully make the process less of a struggle.  We at AILA applaud the Mexican government for making this important change to their policy on birth certificate issuance!

Don’t forget that the roll-out of DACA and DAPA is planned sometime in the coming months.  If you intend to file for either DACA or DAPA, you can take the following steps to prepare:

  1. Have proof of who you are (see above).
  2. Collect documentation proving that you have been in the United States and continuously resided since before January 1, 2010.
  3. For DAPA applicants proof that you are a parent of a permanent resident or U.S. citizen born on or before November 20, 2014.
  4. Proof that the applicant was physically present in the United States on November 20, 2014.
  5. Save your money. The filing fee is expected to be $465 or possibly more for DAPA.  We are still awaiting more guidance regarding the fees.
  6. Collect any criminal records that you may have including arrest records or court dispositions. If you are uncertain about whether a record exists you should get an FBI background check.
  7. If you have any derogatory immigration history or criminal record it is highly recommended that you meet with a qualified attorney to analyze your situation.
  8. Do not fall victim to fraud! Make sure you get information or legal advice from someone you know and trust.

Written by Mo Goldman, Chair, AILA Media Advocacy Committee

New Yorkers Get New ID to Get Past the Velvet Rope

Author: on 01/13/2015

imageClubs are synonymous with New York, and in order to get past the velvet rope, what do you need? Identification. It always helps to know somebody and have a lot of money, but I will curb the comparison of immigrating to the US with getting into Studio 54, lest someone think you can “bribe the doorman.”

New York has just launched the IDNYC card. In an age where you need to be able to identify yourself to access a building, get on a plane or train, make a purchase, open a bank account, get housing, or respond to a police inquiry, a person with no identification, in particular the undocumented, are often made more vulnerable from not being able to prove who they are.

This does not only related to the undocumented. During election time, producing identification was a problem for some elderly citizens.

As the city presents it:

“IDNYC is the new, free identification card for all New York City residents, which gives all of us the opportunity to show who we are—New Yorkers. As a government-issued photo identification card, IDNYC secures the peace of mind and access to City services that come from having recognized identification. IDNYC benefits every city resident, including the most vulnerable communities—the homeless, youth, the elderly, undocumented immigrants, the formerly incarcerated and others who may have difficulty obtaining other government-issued ID.

IDNYC cardholders can access services and programs offered by the City as well as by businesses. IDNYC helps enhance public safety, by serving as a recognized ID for interacting with NYPD. It also helps New Yorkers gain access to all City buildings that provide services to the public and is accepted as a form of identification for accessing numerous City programs and services. IDNYC also provides a dynamic series of benefits to cardholders, including a free one-year membership at many of the City’s leading museums, zoos, concert halls, and botanical gardens.”

It is imperative that we all, as in, all New Yorkers, obtain these IDs. Otherwise, it will be all too easy to be able to identify undocumented individuals by this new ID as the only type of identification available to them. This is one more great innovation by the city to make it more open and welcoming to the vulnerable and to help try to solve the great disconnect between Federal inaction and positive local action. While we wait for reform beyond the President’s Executive action, small steps like these help to make the city more inclusive for a population which already exists. The city is finding a way to work together rather than a hostile attitude of deportations at all costs. Most often, this culture of deportations and “no” costs Americans just as much, since these undocumented individuals provide a very real service, are part of the fabric of our society and they add to the economy.

Instead of hostility, we need to find a way to welcome these individuals. Giving them identification is certainly a great step in the right direction.

Everybody, welcome to the club!

Written by Neena Dutta, Chair, AILA NYC Chapter

‘Tis the Season – H-1B SEASON!

Author: on 01/09/2015

shutterstock_147492446I’m surrounded by dry Christmas trees lying on the sidewalk, nobody is eating and drinking ridiculous amounts any more, and people are pretending to exercise as part of their New Year’s resolutions  – it must be H-1B season!

For 2015, here we are again, with no increase in numbers to the H-1B cap (at least not as of yet). We face harsher adjudicators, with more clients who want to apply, and those clients want a guarantee that they will definitely obtain an H-1B. Such a guarantee can’t be given – not just because of the cap and resulting lottery, but because any denial is almost always upheld. According to the 2013 Ombudsman’s report which was brought to our attention by Diane Butler of Seattle, WA, “The vast majority of appeals to the AAO are dismissed, that is, denials are upheld.  For H-1Bs in 2013, 858 appeals were dismissed and only 12 appeals were sustained (overturning denials), approximately 1%!

Wait, why are we excited to start H-1B season again?

The H-1B is one of the few visas available for US employers who want to remain competitive in the global economy, that do not require a particular nationality (Es), extraordinary ability (Os), or having worked for that company previously (Ls). Seems like these are people our country would want to encourage. Instead we attorneys are constantly battling the service centers for a visa that not only helps to retain talented young students who have newly graduated, but also gives US employers a choice in worker.

There is nothing more frustrating than an employer telling you how much they desperately need this person, how much value this person either already brings to the table or how much they believe the person will add value to the company and help that company to grow, and yet USCIS has taken very strict, almost draconian views of a small company’s ability to support a new position, and in particular a business development position.

I don’t mind sharing with you (although it pains me) that I had a particularly tough denial for a small but growing company.  It was immensely frustrating because the company, though small, had a detailed business plan which included growth, they had funding of well over a million dollars, and were registered on the SEC showing their plans to go public, and we submitted letters of support from other companies, similar jobs from the industry.  Crickets.  USCIS rejected our evidence and even stated that “companies such as yours would normally outsource such a position.”  Really?  Not only do you want to deny this position, but now you want a company from the U.S. to outsource this job???   Years ago the same position, for the same type of company would have been approved in the blink of an eye.  Times have changed.

We are not completely powerless.  First and foremost, as attorneys we need to make sure that our work is exemplary.  If we are armed with an airtight case, it will make the next stages much easier to embark upon.  Next, you need to know your options after an egregious denial: do you appeal?  Do you litigate?  Litigation?  I am a business immigration attorney.  I do transactional work, not the courtroom.  Can you do it?

Absolutely!  Tammy Fox-Isicoff of Miami, FL has tried and tested this method with success: “I haven’t abandoned all hope- but after 30 yrs. of doing this… and holding out “hope,” the hope is fading. Much of the time, I go to Federal Court. pro bono, even for clients who can pay, to right a wrong. Federal Court is all on motion, on these cases. The Court looks at the administrative records and decides if the immigration decision is arbitrary, capricious or an abuse of discretion. I paper my files, put in affidavits from experts, and academia. The government provides no experts. It is often not difficult to litigate and win a well prepared NIV filing. In fact, usually the appeal becomes the Motion for Summary Judgment-thus the time commitment is often only several hours more than it was for the appeal. ”

But we should not stop at litigation.  Not everyone has the time or resources for that.  We need to collectively strategize and bring to the attention of the Administration what a waste of resources these denials are.  Additionally, think about the loss in tax revenue, resources and filing fees for employers.  Employers/businesses are constituents too.   Congressmen should be bending over backwards to help businesses with this issue.  The enormous misconception is that H-1Bs are cheap labor.  Whoever made that statement clearly did not look up the Department of Labor’s wage survey.  Collectively, we can change this.

And until we do, we all still have the cap season ahead of us.

On Monday night, AILA’s New York City Chapter had our 2015 kick-off meeting.  The topic was H-1Bs Strategies and Preparing For April 1st. We were joined by Rachel Baskin, Bill Stock, Allen Orr and Alexis Axelimage1 (2)rad, who all gave us helpful hints and strategies of how to deal with upcoming H-1B season. Here are a few highlights:

  • File the LCA Early: It is never too early to file an LCA. Sure, the employee will lose 4-6 months on the back end, but that is not completely lost by any means. It is better to start filing them now and avoid iCert issues, business existence issues and general glitches or errors.
  • History: Find out the US immigration history of the Beneficiary: surprisingly some people are not aware that they have even had an H-1B before. You may be able to file now to see if their H-1B can be ported, and at least you will find out now instead of in the lottery on April 1st.
  • Errors: Unfortunately, errors are fatal during a lottery. Any mistake can cost you the petition – checks, signatures, lack of checking the correct box.
  • Quality control: For solos or small practices, everyone really: get it done early. Don’t put a package together same day as you are sending it out. If you scan items in, review the pdf.  Review the shipping label. Do not send to the wrong address. Did the employer move since you last filed a petition for them? Review, review, review.
  • Filing Fees: If your client does not want to write the filing fee checks directly, or you wish to monitor the checks, put the money in the trust account and write checks from the trust account.
  • Don’t hold back: given the shift toward negative adjudications, don’t hold back any information/evidence that could bolster the case.

Whether you have one H-1B to file, or ten, or one thousand, we are all in this together. The only way to show that USCIS is issuing unreasonable RFEs is to send them to or use liaison.

See you at season’s end!

Written by Neena Dutta, Chair, AILA NYC Chapter

Starting Off the New Year

Author: on 01/02/2015

shutterstock_238081117I promised myself that this year I would sleep in and not rush to my email and/or open my computer before I had my first cup of coffee. Sigh. At 6:45 a.m. on the first day of 2015 I had already broken my first resolution.

Resolutions are the bane of many an existence right about now. They are at the same time harbingers of hope and change and also the unwelcome reminders of good intentions forgotten or ignored.

Although our President did not call his recent statements and plans for changes to our immigration system “resolutions,” I am considering them such and I am resolved (Holman Resolution #2) to see that he keeps them.

Heck, I’m aiming big. Why not?  Surely it is an easier resolution to keep than following some new-fangled diet or juice cleanse.

The President told us that business development in the U.S. and keeping families together are of paramount importance to him and necessary for the wellbeing of our country. I agree. We all agree. Lets make it so, now, in early 2015.

The President doesn’t need to wait for regulations to be written. If he and his administration take the following four easy steps we can and will start to immediately see some of the reform we desperately need.

  1. Direct the agencies responsible for immigration (USCIS, CBP, ICE, DOS) to follow the laws as written and with an eye towards inclusion rather than exclusion! We have lived with the preference for denial for too long. A bit of direction to the agencies in this area (i.e. returning to the long-followed definition of affiliation that permitted hospitals and medical facilities to employ the doctors they so desperately need, actually approving statutorily qualified L-1 petitions, recognizing that employees genuinely telecommute, recognizing the importance of foreign artists and athletes) would in just a few months make huge inroads in accomplishing what we need and what the President said he desires.
  2. Ensure that the agencies speak to and hear each other by hosting regular Interagency Stakeholder meetings. Since the dissolution of the INS and creation of separate agencies to accomplish what was once accomplished by one agency, adjudications have become wildly inconsistent. Needless to say the lack of consistency in adjudications has created havoc for businesses and is causing them to give up on the U.S. and take their money and innovations elsewhere. We tell our businesses that even if their petition has been approved another agency may decide not to honor the approval and may subsequently deny it. And to make matters worse, they won’t be told why.
  3. Remind the agencies that attorneys are an integral part of the process and encourage and require them to work meaningfully with counsel, both in liaision and as counsel to clients. I can’t count the amount of times I, my clients, and other AILA members related encounters with the government where attorney intervention, assistance or even input was not only denied, but worse disparaged.  My favorite quote and the most often repeated in the past 8 years is this: “when we see an attorney’s letter or encounter their presence we assume that something is wrong.”  Really?  I hire an accountant not because I cheat at my taxes but because she ensures that what I file is done correctly.  Our President is himself an attorney, he must get this.
  4. Stop the immoral and inhumane incarceration of kids and their moms fleeing danger and ensure that the laws we enacted to protect them are followed.   Our President knows that denying bond and/or moving families without notice to their attorneys or relatives and without due process is wrong and harmful. He can stop it.  He must stop it.

The President is lucky. He has two years to accomplish his resolutions and to fight tooth and nail for additional action on immigration through Congress and the executive branch. I thank him for his promises and resolve that we, AILA, will do what we can to guarantee his success.  Here’s to, and cheers to, 2015.

Written by Leslie A. Holman, AILA President

The Happiest Day Still Shadowed by Injustice

Author: on 12/09/2014

shutterstock_190048664Yesterday was one of the happiest days in my life as an immigration lawyer.

I’m helping out pro bono with clients at the Karnes Family Detention Center in Texas and yesterday Immigration Judge Glenn McPhaul granted a $1500 bond to my client from El Salvador and her 19 month old toddler. They’ve both been incarcerated by our government for over two months.

My client is one of the bravest people I have ever met.  She has suffered through unspeakable domestic violence and gang abuse and is still just a teenager. We’re working now to post this bond and to get Mama and baby on their way to their sponsor in New York.

At the end of our hearing, Judge McPhaul turned to me and asked if I wanted to speak with my client.

I certainly wanted to explain to her in my best Spanish that we’d won the lowest bond amount possible from this court and that soon she and her toddler will be freed and traveling to New York. But I got so choked up I first had to compose myself.  With tears in my eyes,  I  explained the good news.  She also cried with joy and relief.  Everyone in the courtroom, including the judge, seemed to be very happy at that point.

Please understand that I’ve concentrated my immigration career on employment and family based

immigration cases. I was worried that my training and experience hadn’t prepared me for this kind of case, and that I hadn’t been around immigration court enough to be a competent advocate for my valiant client. Fortunately I wasn’t in this alone.

I had my long-time mentor, Barbara Hines, telling me why I needed to volunteer for a Karnes bond case, about the difference I could make, and her promise to help me.

I had another mentor, Kate Lincoln-Goldfinch. Kate was with me as I traveled to Karnes when we first met my client (and her own pro bono client). She accompanied me to two immigration court appearances in San Antonio including yesterday’s bond hearing.  Kate fielded my texts, emails, and calls, and gave me wonderful advice and encouragement.

There are a number of other wonderful lawyers who encouraged and helped me.  I now have a much greater admiration and respect for all pro bono immigration defense lawyers, and all the lawyers and support staff at the nonprofit agencies who fight these righteous battles each and every day.

Although I’m elated that my client and her baby will be free to await the remainder of their court proceedings while being kept safe and secure by relatives who wait with open arms, I’m absolutely appalled and disappointed that our country is detaining children and families.  It is unconscionable for our country to detain children and families.

The happiest day for me as an immigration lawyer will really be when family detention stops and when our government acts in a way that reflects our values and our history. That day is not today. I hope it’s coming  soon. I urge you to step forward to oppose family detention and help these clients who so desperately need our advocacy and protection.

Written by Paul Parsons, AILA Member and Karnes Volunteer


If you are an AILA member who wants to volunteer at a family detention center, please go to or feel free to contact Maheen Taqui at–we are looking for more as the work continues and we could really use your help.

If you aren’t able to come help in person, consider donating at And thank you!

To watch videos of the volunteers at Artesia and elsewhere sharing their experiences, go to this playlist on AILA National’s YouTube page. To see all the blog posts about this issue select Family Detention as the category on the right side of this page.

Building on a Shared Moment of Community to Move Forward

Author: on 12/05/2014

AdminReform_300x200I was in the Copernicus Community Center last week, in the heart of Chicago’s Polish community, when President Obama stood in front of a diverse crowd of Chicagoans and made his case in support of the executive actions he announced on November 20. There was energy, there was excitement, and there was a sense of success. Finally after six years of waiting during his presidency, after more than two decades of waiting since the last legislative change, we were celebrating an important step forward.

At this point, we have had the opportunity to study the bundle of releases, memos, and other documents that made up the executive action announcement.  We know that plan includes expansion of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program and a new Deferred Action for Parental Accountability (DAPA).  There will be new ways that entrepreneurs can contribute to our country, an expansion of the Optional Practical Training Program (OPT) and a promise to “modernize and improve the immigrant visa process.”

It has been an emotional time for many of our clients in the immigrant communities.  Practitioners in Chicago have seen a range of reactions depending on the way the program will affect their clients and their families.  Some have broken down crying, with tears of joy because of the hope engendered by the new deferred action options, or tears of sadness and frustration that they or their loved ones won’t be eligible to apply.  But that afternoon in the Copernicus Center, representatives of Latino, Polish, Asian, Irish, African and other communities gathered together to celebrate an important step forward for many of their members.

However, not all of the provisions in the executive action will benefit immigrant communities.  The executive action includes further militarization of the border and a continued commitment to massive expansion of family detention and deportations. The conditions and lack of due process that our pro bono members are seeing in detention centers like Artesia and Karnes represent violations of U.S. humanitarian and asylum law and the traumatization of children and mothers.

The President’s action could have also done more for business.  An effective immigration policy needs to drive innovation, commerce and job creation.  The executive action promises to provide some foreign students with helpful workarounds to the constraints of the H-1B cap, will hopefully ease some of the pressure of the employment based green card backlogs, and seeks to increase immigrant worker mobility.  But it does not provide the necessary fundamental changes to the system that employers need for them to be able to attract the best and brightest talent so that our economy can thrive.

The executive action is not perfect, and it does not go as far as many had hoped.  But it can and will change lives for the better and provide some relief to U.S. business. For those in the immigrant communities who will be able to emerge from the shadows, there will be many fresh chances to begin new lives with more opportunity, stability and dignity.

Unfortunately, notarios and other unscrupulous individuals are already emerging to profit from this moment of hope and excitement, often defrauding immigrants, and in some cases leading to denial of benefits or even deportation.  Here in Chicago, AILA lawyers are working hard with our colleagues in the non-profit service sector, Congressman Gutierrez, the City of Chicago and other allies to educate the community to minimize the risk to this vulnerable population.

Last week, among elected officials, civic leaders and members of the community, I had the opportunity to share a moment of celebration with the President in what has been a long and frustrating struggle to move immigration reform forward.  That afternoon, we emerged energized and ready to move forward.

The President’s executive action was an exciting development but it is a stop-gap measure.  Now Congress needs to do its job and provide us with the legislation for an immigration system that stimulates economic growth, promotes family unity and upholds the standards of fairness and due process that underlie our country’s legal and moral fabric.

Now is the time to harness our moment of celebration and move into next year with renewed energy and focus to achieve real reform.

Written by Marketa Lindt, AILA Secretary

The Business Related Provisions of the President’s Executive Action – A Call for Prompt Action

Author: on 11/25/2014

AdminReform_300x200While the centerpiece of President Obama’s courageous executive order is the provisions which grant employment authorization and provide protection from deportation for an estimated 4 million immigrants, important business-related immigration procedures were also part of this action.

In a carefully thought out plan to provide limited relief to alleviate the unrealistic caps placed upon temporary and permanent work visas for professionals, a number of measures were made part of the President’s initiative.  Also included were measures to facilitate entry in the U.S. for foreign entrepreneurs, inventors, and researchers. These provisions, once implemented, will help alleviate some of the problems produced by our broken immigration system.

The only provision that has a projected timeline is the plan to give employment authorization to certain spouses of long time H-1B visa holders.  There had already been a proposed regulation issued last May.

Some of the other measures will require the promulgation of regulations while others require a change in policy created by U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).

Enthusiasm for these new measures must be tempered due to the history of promised policy guidelines which often take eons of time to issue or have never materialized. The challenge for the business community and all stakeholders is to make sure that these measures are initiated, drafted, and implemented in a timely fashion.  The November 20, 2014 memorandum from DHS Secretary Jeh Charles Johnson to USCIS Director Leon Rodriguez, which outlines in greater detail the provisions announced by President Obama, expressed the expectation that the proposals contained in the memorandum would be “published in a timely manner.”

While regulations which have a limited impact can be issued as interim rules and take effect immediately, most regulations require the publication of a proposed rule with a 30 to 60-day comment period. Afterwards, the government agency must cull though public comments and decide if revisions to the proposed regulation are in order. Of particular note is the Department of Labor’s announcement that it will modernize the PERM regulations.

The business provisions included in the President’s executive actions can have a substantial economic benefit for our country but they have to be implemented expeditiously to make a difference.  It is my hope that there will be an institutional change recognizing the need to move forward with these provisions immediately.

Written by Deb Notkin, AILA Media Advocacy Committee Member

Action at Last

Author: on 11/24/2014

I AdminReform_300x200watched with bated breath. I listened to President Obama make his last case for why administrative action was not just the right thing to do, it was the only thing to do. And I heard from him what his plans entailed.

I read, amazed, the barrage of news reports and opinion pieces before, during, and after the announcement. I combed through the documents AILA compiled and posted. I’m gathering as much information as possible.

The whole time I have been thinking nonstop.

I’ve been running through my clients, tagging those I think will be affected by some of the announced plans (though I’m waiting for those devilish details). I’ve been jotting down questions I have about L-1s and entrepreneurs, about DAPA and DACA, about all the moving parts of these announcements.

I also thought about families I’ve never met. Children and parents I’ve never seen who are feeling so hopeful now. I thought about Jose Antonio Vargas, someone I had the pleasure to talk with at our Annual Conference at the opening of his movie, who now becomes eligible for Deferred Action – and to see his mom – because of this administrative relief.

There is so much damage done to so many lives, to so many businesses and communities because of our broken immigration system. And I’m fed up.

To be honest, I wanted and still want legislative reform, the sort of reform that will offer a solid foundation on which a new system that actually fits the needs of our country can be built. We still don’t have that.

But we do have a President who is acting in the best interest of the country after months of delays by Congress.  The actions he has taken will keep the America safer and offer relief that takes into account the needs of families and businesses.

As President he can’t fix all the problems with America’s current immigration system. That’s not how our country works. So this is a stopgap measure. It’s not permanent but what I desperately hope is that Congress will respond. Not with ridiculous claims that they will impeach the President and have him serve time for his executive overreach, but instead respond with measured, deliberate, careful consideration of an actual immigration reform bill.

That feels like a lot to ask in the rancorous political environment in which we find ourselves today. But it’s not too much to ask. So today I’m saying thank you to the President and I’m asking Congress, for the umpteenth time: won’t you please pass immigration reform?

Written by Leslie A. Holman, AILA President

Who Are We Turning Away?

Author: on 11/19/2014

Helping handA pregnant woman, separated from her husband in a time of regional conflict and instability, flees the central region of her country with a single suitcase and her 2 year old daughter and 1 year old son. The goal is to travel by train to the closest major southern land border in the hopes of reuniting soon with her husband who is fighting far away from home. Every day, people gather around the border crossing waiting for the gates to open and the glimmer of opportunity to cross into another sovereign land. If you miss the timing and fail to cross, the consequences may be worse than death. With her suitcase in one hand and her 1 year old son holding her other, her two year old daughter grabs onto her mother’s dress as the crowd pushes forward trying to get through. Immovable by the throngs of bodies pushing, the pregnant woman lets the crowd sway her and her children through to the protection promised by the neighboring country.

Once on the other side, she reevaluates her surroundings acknowledging the luggage in one hand, her son in the other and only then is aware that her daughter no longer clings to her dress. She screams amongst the shouting crowd, “Where is my daughter? Where is she?” On the other side of the crossing is the two year old daughter with her eyes only able to see the back of people’s legs unaware of where her family went. With a quick motion, she finds herself atop the shoulders of a man she does not know, a man wearing a business suit walking past the crossing. Disoriented, she is still unaware of where she is or how she lost her mother and brother. This little girl cannot tell time and does not know how long it took before she could her hear her mother’s cries and reunited with her. Without even realizing, this little girl is forever labeled by her mother as “lucky” in their native language. And the identity of the nice gentleman in the business suit is never discovered.

The tale told is not a unique story. Although it happened in 1949, it continues to be a story relatable in our present day. As a young child, I remember my grandmother recounting the horrors of a civil war that destroyed her comfortable life. I never understood what my grandmother meant when she said repeatedly that my mother was so very “lucky.” She rarely talked about everything that happened during that time that pitted Chinese against Chinese. I would only hear snippets growing up. But as I got older, I heard more from other family members, even as my mother told me she had a difficult time remembering much of anything during her younger years in Hong Kong.

When she passed away unexpectedly in 2011, I was in charge of taking care of all the family matters with her death. I vividly recall going through her unorganized stacks of important papers kept all over the house and finding a photocopy of a document titled “Refugee Resettlement Land Allocation” something or another. And in this document was a blurry photo of my mother and her family; her as a preteen and my youngest auntie in my grandmother’s arms.

My mother and her side of the family never lamented how they lost everything in the fighting. Instead, they talked about how grateful they were to be alive and the chances they took to ensure the family’s survival. Despite living in a shanty on a hill in Hong Kong, they were grateful for the British Colonial government’s generosity in allowing them to have a place to call their own, to be safe from harm.

I have spent almost 7 of my 8 years of practice as an immigration attorney hearing stories no different from my family’s own history. What my clients seek under the U.S. asylum law is no different than what my family sought when they asked for refuge in Hong Kong. My clients just want to be able to live their lives in safety, to give their children of the opportunities they didn’t have, to move on from a limbo state of violence and begin anew.

But things have gotten much harder. For instance, in 2008, my asylum clients could reasonably expect to have an interview and receive a decision within 4 months. Now, a current client finds themselves in a U.S. asylum system where the wait may be well over two years just for an interview to present their case before an asylum officer. In the meantime, they are ineligible to apply for work authorization until their case has been pending 150 days. And even once that deadline has passed, many face further delays and cryptic reasons for the inability of the U.S. immigration service to process their request.

In my practice, I find myself telling clients that they may wait years before an interview is scheduled. I find myself having to give them cold hard numbers to understand the uphill journey they will set themselves on if they decide to apply for asylum. I tell them that in our jurisdiction, the asylum office has over 10,000 backlogged cases waiting for an interview. I tell them that an average 900 new cases are submitted monthly with only 300-600 cases interviewed that same month.

During this time, they find themselves physically safe but still in a state of panic thinking of their families that stayed behind. The only way for them to bring their children or spouses away from the dangers in their country is for them to win their case. Unlike what my mother and her family went through, my clients find themselves living in limbo never knowing how long or when they may be able to tell their stories. They spend each day wondering when and if they can ever reunite with their family members in safety.

How did my family story end up? Well, at the age of 17, my mother was recruited to train as a nurse in England. She eventually immigrated to the United States in the late 1960’s and brought my grandmother, two aunts and two uncles to the U.S. My mother’s family was small. They only had each other. If my mother tried to bring over her family in the present day, it would most likely only be my grandmother that would be allowed to immigrate. The decades long wait times for brothers and sisters would eliminate any possibility of a timely reunification. What would be lost would be an entire generation of people. Every child from my mother and her siblings (we were all born in the U.S.) went on to graduate from colleges such as Notre Dame, University of Chicago, Vanderbilt, University of Southern California and University of Texas. This is what the U.S. loses out on when delays in adjudications go on for years.

As the immigration debate intensifies into politics, what often gets forgotten are the individuals, the living beings, affected by the current broken system. As rhetoric takes aim at increasing funding for enforcement and a growing police state near the borders, people lose sight of the lack of resources and funding needed to help people who are waiting in limbo.

Politics has gotten in the way of what truly matters in this debate: fixing the laws to reduce wait times, reinforcing existing infrastructure to allow the immigration agency and its employees to adjudicate cases, giving people the opportunity to have their cases heard and allowing people to begin their lives. Immigration is about people, not politics, and President Obama should do all he can to make our system work.

Written by Tammy Lin, AILA Media Advocacy Committee Member